<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Whatbook??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bryanschwegler.com/2006/01/10/the-whatbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bryanschwegler.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbryanschwegler.com%2F2006%2F01%2F10%2Fthe-whatbook%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Whatbook%3F%3F</link>
	<description>Fresh squeezed goodness</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://bryanschwegler.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbryanschwegler.com%2F2006%2F01%2F10%2Fthe-whatbook%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Whatbook%3F%3F#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanschwegler.com/2006/01/10/the-whatbook/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>It's not true that they couldn't have stuck with Power, since the first PowerBooks didn't even have PowerPC processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not true that they couldn&#8217;t have stuck with Power, since the first PowerBooks didn&#8217;t even have PowerPC processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://bryanschwegler.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbryanschwegler.com%2F2006%2F01%2F10%2Fthe-whatbook%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Whatbook%3F%3F#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanschwegler.com/2006/01/10/the-whatbook/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Well technically the Powerbook line is gone, and I'll say that the Macbook product is definitely a worthy sucecssor. I just question the name "Macbook". Just doesn't seem elegant to me.

As for iPhoto, I'll definitely let you know. It's really the only reason I buy iLife as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well technically the Powerbook line is gone, and I&#8217;ll say that the Macbook product is definitely a worthy sucecssor. I just question the name &#8220;Macbook&#8221;. Just doesn&#8217;t seem elegant to me.</p>
<p>As for iPhoto, I&#8217;ll definitely let you know. It&#8217;s really the only reason I buy iLife as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanharne</title>
		<link>http://bryanschwegler.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbryanschwegler.com%2F2006%2F01%2F10%2Fthe-whatbook%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Whatbook%3F%3F#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanharne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanschwegler.com/2006/01/10/the-whatbook/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>"death of the PowerBook line"? The MacBook Pro &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the latest 15" PowerBook equivalent. But, since it is the first of the transition to portable Intel-Mac machines, they can't stick to the "Power..." naming scheme that was based on the PowerPC architecture. Jobs explains this in the Keynote. "MacBook" still hasn't settled well with me, but I think it is a nice accompanying move to further distance that portion of the Apple setup from the IBM generation. I think this will develop nicely over time. So, yeah. Let me know how the new iPhoto is because that is the only reason why I would actually get iLife'06 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;death of the PowerBook line&#8221;? The MacBook Pro <em>is</em> the latest 15&#8243; PowerBook equivalent. But, since it is the first of the transition to portable Intel-Mac machines, they can&#8217;t stick to the &#8220;Power&#8230;&#8221; naming scheme that was based on the PowerPC architecture. Jobs explains this in the Keynote. &#8220;MacBook&#8221; still hasn&#8217;t settled well with me, but I think it is a nice accompanying move to further distance that portion of the Apple setup from the IBM generation. I think this will develop nicely over time. So, yeah. Let me know how the new iPhoto is because that is the only reason why I would actually get iLife&#8217;06 <img src="http://bryanschwegler.com/wp-content/plugins/more-smilies/Phoenity/smile.png" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://bryanschwegler.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbryanschwegler.com%2F2006%2F01%2F10%2Fthe-whatbook%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Whatbook%3F%3F#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanschwegler.com/2006/01/10/the-whatbook/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Ugh, I *hate* the new name. Absurd!

As for "I can't believe they're two times faster": &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2006/january#tue-10-yager" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://daringfireball.net/linked/2006/january#tue-10-yager&lt;/a&gt;

Eek!

I hope this transition is over quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, I *hate* the new name. Absurd!</p>
<p>As for &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;re two times faster&#8221;: <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2006/january#tue-10-yager" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/daringfireball.net');" rel="nofollow">http://daringfireball.net/linked/2006/january#tue-10-yager</a></p>
<p>Eek!</p>
<p>I hope this transition is over quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
